Ok. The Honeymoon is over. When is the problem that forces users to leave the applicaion in memory going to be fixed? It was brought to the forground over 4 months ago.

---

I don't think quoting a time is going to help anything. They have a list of issues that need to be worked on, and they prioritize their work on what is at the top of the list at any given time.

I operate half a dozen machines with 128 of ram, and dozens with 256, all of which haven't shown the least bit of trouble leaving the application in memory. This is even when they are running all our business applications and the physical memory is full (in some cases using >60% of the scratch space).

I'm not suggesting the bug should be forgotten, but there are issues that prevent people from participating (freezing at 1%, max time exceeded, bandwidth) that are currently being worked on.

-Ethan

---

yes i would like it so you dont have to leave in memory but guess what i have that option selected even before i knew it was important for this project

Yea there are lots of issues out there and Leave in memory is one of them...

personaly i dont think its rank 1 or so priority

also it may take time to figur out WHY it errors when it swaps... more alpha/beta testing

---

---

---

Ok. The Honeymoon is over. When is the problem that forces users to leave the applicaion in memory going to be fixed? It was brought to the forground over 4 months ago.

I don't leave mine in memory and I run Rosetta just fine.

---

David Stites
Mount Vernon, WA USA

I don't leave mine in memory and I run Rosetta just fine.

If just fine means it completes SOME work units OK, I guess you're right.

Your Athlon X2 (host id 765) has nearly as many WUs with client errors as it has successes - I wonder how many of those are due to you not leaving them in memory.

---

*** Join BOINC@Australia today ***

I don't leave mine in memory and I run Rosetta just fine.

If just fine means it completes SOME work units OK, I guess you're right.

Your Athlon X2 (host id 765) has nearly as many WUs with client errors as it has successes - I wonder how many of those are due to you not leaving them in memory.

Yep I am also seeing this problem. Unfortunately leaving applications in memory will not help me. The host usually won't get back to the workunit before a restart anyway.

---

BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8

Just as feedback, for consideration, I didn't have the "Leave in memory" option enabled until just now, and sofar had 2 errors in 50 WUs on my XP test machine:

host128426

On the other hand, I've had 2 errors in 4 WUs with a Linux box sofar (which has marginal under-spec'ed hardware vs R@H recommended hw, i.e. only 256MB RAM, but except for BOINC it's mostly idle), but it's probably the WUs themselves at fault, bec they failed in several other PCs as well:

err wu1
err wu2

---

Best UFO Resources
Wikipedia R@h
How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity

I don't leave mine in memory and I run Rosetta just fine.

If just fine means it completes SOME work units OK, I guess you're right.

Your Athlon X2 (host id 765) has nearly as many WUs with client errors as it has successes - I wonder how many of those are due to you not leaving them in memory.

Probably none.

---

David Stites
Mount Vernon, WA USA

---

David Baker has just posted that the new client is to be released "later this week" in this post.

Of course, what this upcoming release addresses is to be seen. :)

EDIT: found another post with more info.

---

---

Best UFO Resources
Wikipedia R@h
How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity

I wonder how exactly the process of "removing app from memory" is handled by BOINC and science app? I guess Rosetta would lose some of its temporary results, since its last "checkpoint"? (writing temporary results to disk every x minutes or y progress?) when it's pre-empted and removed from memory. It probably won't be able to save its work up to the last sec of computation.

In short, I've had zero trouble with the "leave apps in mem when pre-empted" (even with marginal hosts, as outlined below, btw that Linux w/256M RAM has over 110 processes running) and wonder how much overhead I'd pay by returning to "removing apps".

I know I could look at the source of some open-source science app like SETI, and asking this in the BOINC forums, but ... I thought I'd ask here too :-)

---

Best UFO Resources
Wikipedia R@h
How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity

It is important to note that the memory we are talking about is not actual RAM but in fact is virtual memory (on disk), so the actuaal impact of this is not that significant. In addition you can adjust how much memory is used by the application in this regard.

Note that it is indeed the actual RAM, only the system can decide to move
RAM to the swap space

... and then ... some apps (eg: simap) ends with no finished file when moved
to swap ...

Date Host Project ID Message
2/17/2006 10:48:50 AM crobertp.cp3 boincsimap 2825 Result 200601277.018731_1 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
2/17/2006 10:48:50 AM crobertp.cp3 boincsimap 2826 If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
2/17/2006 10:48:50 AM crobertp.cp3 --- 2827 request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
2/17/2006 10:48:50 AM crobertp.cp3 boincsimap 2828 Restarting result 200601277.018731_1 using simap version 507

Leaving RAM filled with stopped tasks, is not a very good idea ...
Ideally all apps should checkpoint , and then exit or suspend into ram

How about reboot / power losses ? Is the ram keept accross reboots ?
I believe is not !!!

---

Click signature for global team stats

With your permission I would like to add your question and the answer to the FAQs, and credit it to you and your team.

Sure, feel free to add/edit this Q (or any other post of mine) to the FAQ. Thx.

---

Best UFO Resources
Wikipedia R@h
How-To: Join Distributed Computing projects that benefit humanity