Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 . . . 301 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
I have a stuck workunit: it's spent several hours at least stuck on Model 6 Step 7205 (Fast Relax). It's an all-sheet hexamer. Is it worth letting it continue? Yes, I'd let it continue. |
svincent Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 219 Credit: 12,120,035 RAC: 0 |
I have a stuck workunit: it's spent several hours at least stuck on Model 6 Step 7205 (Fast Relax). It's an all-sheet hexamer. Is it worth letting it continue? Good advice: it successfully completed and validated. tx. |
mqk Send message Joined: 5 Jul 16 Posts: 1 Credit: 4,241,297 RAC: 0 |
Hello, I have BOINC 7.4.53 on my Android phone. I have received a lot of computation errors (more then success results). For example https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=902985860. In that task details you can find Invalid address 0xf6fd3e40 passed to free: value not allocated in <stderr_txt> section. For other tasks it is similar, only memory address differs (0xf71dde40, 0xf722be40 etc.). Thank you for help ======================================= All stderr out of task 902985860 (name 12res_c4m_pred1_c.6.9_0009_SAVE_ALL_OUT_469166_306_1, workunit 814737734): <core_client_version>7.4.53</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process got signal 11 </message> <stderr_txt> [2017- 2-24 21:51:42:] :: BOINC:: Initializing ... ok. [2017- 2-24 21:51:42:] :: BOINC :: boinc_init() BOINC:: Worker initialized successfully. command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/minirosetta_android_3.77_arm-android-linux-gnu @res2_binoculars_binoculars_TRP2.flags -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 10800 -boinc:max_nstruct 600 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 2005177 Registering options.. Registered extra options. Initializing broker options ... Registered extra options. Initializing core... Initializing options.... ok Options::initialize() Options::adding_options() Options::initialize() Check specs. Options::initialize() End reached Loaded options.... ok Processed options.... ok Initializing random generators... ok Initialization complete. Initializing options.... ok Options::initialize() Options::adding_options() Options::initialize() Check specs. Options::initialize() End reached Loaded options.... ok Processed options.... ok Initializing random generators... ok Initialization complete. Unpacking zip data: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/minirosetta_database_0cb8dc1_A.zip Unpacking WU data ... Unpacking data: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/res2_binoculars_binoculars_TRP2.zip Setting database description ... Setting up checkpointing ... BOINC:: Worker startup. Starting watchdog... Watchdog active. # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600 reached end of minirosetta::main() ====================================================== DONE :: 2 starting structures 2497.49 cpu seconds This process generated 2 decoys from 2 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: WS_max 7.49036e+07 BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down cleanly ... 22:34:49 (1060): called boinc_finish(0) Invalid address 0xf722be40 passed to free: value not allocated </stderr_txt> ]]> |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
Hi mqk, can you email me the type of device you're using with the hardware specs such as memory? Anything that can help us diagnose the issue. We do see instability in a number of devices but do not have access to test these devices locally at the moment. dekim at uw dot edu thanks, David K |
WetherM Send message Joined: 28 Aug 12 Posts: 2 Credit: 200,913 RAC: 0 |
I have not received any WU from Rosetta for months. I have removed and added the project back. I continually get the message "Communication Deferred". I have set cache to 0 days +1.5 days as suggested above in this thread. I am running BOINC mgr 7.6.33 on a late 2011 MacBook Pro 2.2GHz Intel Core i7, OS X 10.11.6. This device has been functioning for years, Seti since 2004, Rosetta since 2012. Seti still functions and receives work. Rosetta no longer will connect and get work. I have suspended Seti, still no work for Rosetta and no connection, continuous "Communication Deferred" message with a countdown timer. Any ideas are helpful. I have made my way through this thread trying all suggestions but to no avail. Thanks, |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
I have not received any WU from Rosetta for months. I have removed and added the project back. I continually get the message "Communication Deferred". Can you go to the boinc manager and click on the Tools -> Event Log... pull down option and then copy and email me the contents? dekim at uw dot edu I just installed the boinc client on a 10.11.6 iMac (late 2011) 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5, and within a few minutes it started running a R@h task. I'm not sure what is going on with your particular computer but maybe the event log might shed some useful info. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2121 Credit: 41,179,074 RAC: 11,480 |
Hi mqk, Same here using a Samsung Galaxy S6 Hardware specifics available through the task details of each WU |
David E K Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 1018 Credit: 4,334,829 RAC: 0 |
Hi mqk, Thanks! If anyone else is having similar issues, please let us know the device type. |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2121 Credit: 41,179,074 RAC: 11,480 |
Intermittent problems with the website atm? 06/03/2017 23:16:51 | rosetta@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. |
BlisteringSheep Send message Joined: 15 Sep 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 26,475,297 RAC: 2,285 |
bakerlab.org hosts are not resolvable. None of the bakerlab.org hosts (boinc, ralph, srv[1-5], mail) are globally resolvable. I haven't been able to find any public DNS server that will resolve these (I was able to connect by writing static entries in my local hosts file). |
BlisteringSheep Send message Joined: 15 Sep 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 26,475,297 RAC: 2,285 |
bakerlab.org hosts are not resolvable. Update: from this list of providers, only Comodo Secure DNS (8.26.56.26), DNS Advantage (156.154.70.1), Norton ConnectSafe (199.85.126.10) and Alternate DNS (198.101.242.72) were able to resolve. Level3 (209.244.0.3) Verisign (64.6.64.6) Google (8.8.8.8) DNS.WATCH (84.200.69.80) Comodo Secure DNS (8.26.56.26) OpenDNS Home (208.67.222.222) DNS Advantage (156.154.70.1) Norton ConnectSafe (199.85.126.10) GreenTeamDNS (81.218.119.11) SafeDNS (195.46.39.39) OpenNIC (96.90.175.167) SmartViper (208.76.50.50) Dyn (216.146.35.35) FreeDNS (37.235.1.174) Alternate DNS (198.101.242.72) Yandex.DNS (77.88.8.8) UncensoredDNS (91.239.100.100) Hurricane Electric (74.82.42.42) puntCAT (109.69.8.51) |
BlisteringSheep Send message Joined: 15 Sep 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 26,475,297 RAC: 2,285 |
bakerlab.org hosts are not resolvable. To help you debug the problem, here is the output from nslookup when using the authoritative nameservers (as reported by InterNIC https://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=bakerlab.org&type=domain) ns1.bakerlab.org and ns5.bakerlab.org in /etc/resolv.conf: ;; Got recursion not available from 128.95.160.253, trying next server ;; Got recursion not available from 140.142.20.94, trying next server Server: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 ** server can't find boinc.bakerlab.org: NXDOMAIN |
Dj Send message Joined: 6 Jan 17 Posts: 1 Credit: 6,257,818 RAC: 0 |
bakerlab.org hosts are not resolvable. I tried the same in my Linux hosts, but even with nsswitch.conf set to resolve from files first, it would still refuse to find the local entries for the servers we need, and for reason I didn't bother to take a deep dive into. What I did find is that the whois-listed nameservers are reachable, and they do resolve the domain information, but have limited (or nonexistent) recursion, so on many of my systems that don't necessarily need to be resolving names of things other than R@H servers, I just set the domain's listed servers for those machines, and they continue to download/upload work. As to why something seems to be broken that is preventing the root nameservers from finding how to pass us along to bakerlab's servers, IDK... everything looks like it should be working, but there's a breakdown right inside there... |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 19 Jan 06 Posts: 881 Credit: 52,257,545 RAC: 0 |
bakerlab.org hosts are not resolvable. This is what worked for me on Windows and Ubuntu: Hosts file Of course, to see that here you have to be able to get to this website anyway, which is a bit of a Catch-22. Good luck. (And I am throwing other machine on it, to do what ICANN.) |
Warped Send message Joined: 15 Jan 06 Posts: 48 Credit: 1,788,185 RAC: 0 |
Welcome Back! See Kel's post about the issue: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10279&postid=76320#76320 |
neil Send message Joined: 22 Dec 06 Posts: 3 Credit: 18,162,630 RAC: 359 |
Yay!! |
Keith E. Laidig Volunteer moderator Project developer Send message Joined: 1 Jul 05 Posts: 154 Credit: 117,189,961 RAC: 0 |
Folks! Thanks for your patience and support during this outage. We appreciate the support of the BOINC community! You are an impressive crew! -KEL |
Dr Who Fan Send message Joined: 28 May 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 263,700 RAC: 242 |
Folks! Thanks for your patience and support during this outage. We appreciate the support of the BOINC community! You are an impressive crew! -KEL Nice to see that things finally got resolved. |
shanen Send message Joined: 16 Apr 14 Posts: 195 Credit: 12,662,308 RAC: 0 |
Folks! Thanks for your patience and support during this outage. We appreciate the support of the BOINC community! You are an impressive crew! -KEL Ditto, and now let me go blame the spammers on "Cafe Rosetta". #1 Freedom = (Meaningful - Constrained) Choice{5} != (Beer^3 | Speech) |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2121 Credit: 41,179,074 RAC: 11,480 |
I'm going to admit that it crossed my mind bakerlab may've decided that they didn't need all the grief they've been getting from moaning nerds like me and decided to pull the whole project... ...so I'm quite relieved it turned out to be someone else's fault. Welcome back all. And try not to do that again <heart attack mode off> |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org