v 187 very low credit

Author	Message
Martin Johnson Send message Joined: 18 Oct 05 Posts: 19 Credit: 171,164 RAC: 0	Message 62573 - Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 23:32:14 UTC Before this new version, work units used to take me 2.5 to 3 hours to process, for which I received credit in the low twenties. The first unit processed using the new version took 7 hours, credit 1.84. Seems rather low. ID: 62573 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Murasaki Send message Joined: 20 Apr 06 Posts: 303 Credit: 511,418 RAC: 0	Message 62574 - Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 23:42:01 UTC - in response to Message 62573. Last modified: 28 Jul 2009, 23:42:44 UTC The task you refer to seems to have encountered an error, though the one result that it was able to return was valid. The error in the task details is described as: WARNING! cannot get file size for default.out.gz: could not open file. Output exists: default.out.gz Size: -1 InternalDecoyCount: 0 (GZ) ----- 0 ----- Stream information inconsistent. Writing W_0000001 ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 25213.4 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== It is unfortunate, but the error is the most likely cause for the low credit. ID: 62574 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Martin Johnson Send message Joined: 18 Oct 05 Posts: 19 Credit: 171,164 RAC: 0	Message 62575 - Posted: 28 Jul 2009, 23:45:46 UTC Thank you, Sherlock, I didn't examine all that. ID: 62575 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Yifan Song Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 26 May 09 Posts: 62 Credit: 7,322 RAC: 0	Message 62576 - Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 0:03:32 UTC This might be a bug. We're working on another update. Sorry about the trouble. ID: 62576 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Martin Johnson Send message Joined: 18 Oct 05 Posts: 19 Credit: 171,164 RAC: 0	Message 62579 - Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 3:37:06 UTC I did wonder, but the next has gone through as normal. ID: 62579 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

P . P . L . Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 581 Credit: 4,865,274 RAC: 0	Message 62580 - Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 3:49:28 UTC Last modified: 29 Jul 2009, 4:39:55 UTC Hi. I posted in the long running models tread, see their for details but most of the time i get close to what i claim or more but not with this one. app was mini 1.87. 36,076.19__106.17__3.24 ID: 62580 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

P . P . L . Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 581 Credit: 4,865,274 RAC: 0	Message 62584 - Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 7:42:56 UTC I have another six & a half hours to do one model on my quad and this is all i get. Not funny! https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=243854311 abinitio_withrelax_homfrag_129_B_1ubi__SAVE_ALL_OUT_13795_832_0 # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 23518.3 cpu seconds This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts ====================================================== 23,518.77__165.62__1.16 ID: 62584 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

dgnuff Send message Joined: 1 Nov 05 Posts: 350 Credit: 24,773,605 RAC: 0	Message 62586 - Posted: 29 Jul 2009, 8:36:09 UTC Last modified: 29 Jul 2009, 8:38:54 UTC Deleted - belongs in the general 1.87 problems thread ID: 62586 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

P . P . L . Send message Joined: 20 Aug 06 Posts: 581 Credit: 4,865,274 RAC: 0	Message 62667 - Posted: 31 Jul 2009, 1:30:33 UTC I have another over 10hrs, is this a validator problem or was it the app. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=245101531 abinitio_withrelax_homfrag_129_B_1vcc__SAVE_ALL_OUT_13795_3017_0 36,285.04__80.24__1.61 ID: 62667 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote