two upgrades to R@H needed

Author	Message
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 11 Feb 06 Posts: 316 Credit: 6,621,003 RAC: 0	Message 45152 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 2:34:58 UTC - in response to Message 45105. Those 16 active hosts (maybe 12 unique PCs) attached to this project must be overwhelming to keep track of. Must take - what? - whole minutes to check up on them? I think you misunderstand what I am looking for. I am not merely trying to see if everything is running as it should right now. I am looking for things like (for example) poor performance over time compared to other machine. Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA ID: 45152 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 11 Feb 06 Posts: 316 Credit: 6,621,003 RAC: 0	Message 45153 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 2:36:28 UTC - in response to Message 45104. If you have remote machines running FIFTY projects, many of them alpha... isn't that sort of asking for trouble? Nope. That's the fun part. Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA ID: 45153 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Angus Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 412 Credit: 321,053 RAC: 0	Message 45156 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 5:15:38 UTC - in response to Message 45152. Those 16 active hosts (maybe 12 unique PCs) attached to this project must be overwhelming to keep track of. Must take - what? - whole minutes to check up on them? I think you misunderstand what I am looking for. I am not merely trying to see if everything is running as it should right now. I am looking for things like (for example) poor performance over time compared to other machine. Just quit detaching and re-attaching, or changing OS' and you shouldn't have that problem. You're creating your own issue by creating so many hosts for the same machine on each project. Maybe you should modify your procedures and processes and not blame BOINC. just a suggestion... Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :) "You can't fix stupid" (Ron White) ID: 45156 · Rating: 1 · rate: / Reply Quote

zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 11 Feb 06 Posts: 316 Credit: 6,621,003 RAC: 0	Message 45159 - Posted: 19 Aug 2007, 5:53:16 UTC - in response to Message 45156. Those 16 active hosts (maybe 12 unique PCs) attached to this project must be overwhelming to keep track of. Must take - what? - whole minutes to check up on them? I think you misunderstand what I am looking for. I am not merely trying to see if everything is running as it should right now. I am looking for things like (for example) poor performance over time compared to other machine. Just quit detaching and re-attaching, or changing OS' and you shouldn't have that problem. You're creating your own issue by creating so many hosts for the same machine on each project. Maybe you should modify your procedures and processes and not blame BOINC. just a suggestion... The machines got split when the BOINC client changed the way the CPU descriptions were listed. It had nothing to do with my activity. Yeah, but none of that would be an issue if the server software worked properly. I shouldn't have to modify my behavior because the SW is broken, especially when a fix is available. And FWIW, I am not trying to merge machines with different OS. Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA ID: 45159 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote