Message boards : Number crunching : Problems with Rosetta version 5.59
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Anime-Addict Send message Joined: 21 Jan 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 447,569 RAC: 0 |
I have seen both the Graphics failing to render strings and the fact that the Graphics freeze up after a certain point. I know that the GFX take up valuable CPU time but it lets me have an excuse to bring my laptop into work at the hangar, under the false pretense of doing collegiate work. |
[B^S] BOINC-SG Send message Joined: 6 Oct 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 101,104 RAC: 0 |
This wu crashed when I clicked on "Show graphics" https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=75486464 My NEW BOINC-Site Why people joined BOINC Synergy... |
Stephen Send message Joined: 5 Jun 06 Posts: 23 Credit: 2,570,438 RAC: 0 |
I have a dual 1.8 GHZ PPC macintosh running the latest OS X. Using Activity Monitor, I see two rosetta@home processes, both named rosetta_5.59_pow. One is using 94% of a CPU, and the other is using about 75% of the other CPU. On the BOINC manager window, I see two processes marked as "running". The CPU time, progress, and to completion only increments for one of the two processes. I speculate that the CPU time, progress, and to completion for the process that is not incrementing, which seems to be older, stopped incrementing when the younger process started. This looks like an OS X specific bug, since my dual core Athlon Ubuntu linux client shows updates for two processes. Is there a place to report bugs somewhere? Thanks. Stephen |
Michael.L Send message Joined: 12 Nov 06 Posts: 67 Credit: 31,295 RAC: 0 |
29/04/07 02:15:57 Can't rename current state file to previous state file; The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process (0x20). This msge was repeated at 07:00:27 Can someone explain?? |
Computerwiesel Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 1 Credit: 13,879 RAC: 0 |
HereĀ“s another WU that crashed when clicked on "Show graphics". https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=75872123 |
fastdude Send message Joined: 11 Nov 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 8,764 RAC: 0 |
The laptop gone into standby or hibernate last night after finishing some downloads, this morning on startup there was a message about boinc crashing, we are sorry, etc. I am not sure if the boinc crash happened on startup or was from last night. on re-launching boinc the task that was shown as almost finished (about 80%?) immediatly reverted to 0.1% with about 2:10 of cpu time & 10H to go. the laptop is a (new) toshiba L30 celeron 1.6 with no screensaver enabled. |
D-Fens Send message Joined: 19 Mar 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 41,231 RAC: 0 |
Hi I just finished a WU, and when i uploaded it, i got 0 credits, and it says Error also, while there was no error. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=75587254 In the message list it says normaly, WU finished, and nothing about an error, it finished just normaly as usual. What is the problem? |
mdettweiler Send message Joined: 15 Oct 06 Posts: 33 Credit: 2,509 RAC: 0 |
I have the following workunit: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=68288157 which is a 10-hour workunit, and has been running fine for a few days of off-and-on computing (I shut my computer down at night, and sometimes during the day). However, sometimes when I started up my computer again, the progress bar would temporarily go back to zero (although in a little while it would be back to normal; I know that some applications do this when they first restart). It also seemed to have started over from the beginning of the model. Not too terribly much of a biggie. Well, at least it wasn't too much of a biggie until today, when it started over from the beginning of model 1! I'm wondering if one of the checkpoints fell through, but the application thought it had checkpointed successfully, and it thus ended up starting over from the beginning. Should I abort this WU? I'm suspending it for now so I don't lose any work on it if I do. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Hi Your result says this: Workunit error - check skipped now we just need modsense or someone to tell us what that means. also there is this that makes things interesting, to many results? |
Michael.L Send message Joined: 12 Nov 06 Posts: 67 Credit: 31,295 RAC: 0 |
Hi I got one of these too. Result ID 76072216 -Workunit Error - check skipped. claimed credit 85. granted credit 0 too many total results. Can see another PC beat me to completion, and got credit too. |
Sailor Send message Joined: 19 Mar 07 Posts: 75 Credit: 89,192 RAC: 0 |
Hmm I found an odd similarity in the WUs from Michael.L and Dfens. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=65985061 The first PC is definetly over the turnaround time of 10 days Sent : 17 Apr 2007 19:24:06 UTC Deadline + 10 days so 27 Apr 2007 Returned : 29 Apr 2007 18:20:37 UTC - 2 days off limit, but got credit meanwhile, at the 27.Apr (the time the WUs deadline on PC1), the wu got send to to PC2, but PC1 however returned a result before him, and got granted credit. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=64752196 The same here Sent: 20 Apr 2007 7:40:31 UTC Deadline: 30 Apr 2007 7:40:31 UTC rosetta sending the WU new @ 30 Apr 2007 7:41:21 UTC However, PC1 is returning a result @ 30 Apr 2007 15:07:00 UTC (7 hours off limit) and got the credit, leaving the 2nd user empty.. Seems to be a bug here, the Clients beeing over the target time should not gain credits from their late results, and the 2 who turned within the targettime (Michael.L and Dfens) should get their credit. Fix it please, give them 2 their deserved 80/85 credits, if this is happening more often, ppl are computing for waste! As it looks to me, their turned in results just went straight to the trash... |
komandar Send message Joined: 13 Dec 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 767,791 RAC: 0 |
The 64bit version of BOINC doesn't work with the current rosetta version: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=3147 |
Michael.L Send message Joined: 12 Nov 06 Posts: 67 Credit: 31,295 RAC: 0 |
According to BOINC Manager. WU - 2ztaA boinc symm fold and dock relax 2ztaa 1639 10600 completed today 13.38.00 uploaded 13.38.02 finished 13.38.05 with BOINC LogX history showing 24 decoys. This WU started to process at 05.11.13. in Work Units i have outstanding 2 WUs 68513611 and 68446495 and the prev completed WU as shown in message below (40138). I see no trace of the WU completed at 13.38.00 either as completed or outstanding in My Work Units (my account) I have updated Boinc Manager twice since 13.38 but cant find seemingly 'missing' WU. That makes 2 successive WUs for which I get no credit. at the same time my RAC has nose dived. BOINC LOGX shows Credits/RAC have not moved for last 2 completed WUs. (includes 2ztaA). All above times are for today. |
[AF>Quebec] YMG Send message Joined: 13 Apr 07 Posts: 2 Credit: 2,685,648 RAC: 0 |
Getting a lot of computing error here most of the form: <core_client_version>5.8.16</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code 1073807364 (0x40010004) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 # random seed: 3013385 # cpu_run_time_pref: 10800 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x7C911C29 read attempt to address 0x00000024 Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... </stderr_txt> ]]> What is going on??? |
Michael.L Send message Joined: 12 Nov 06 Posts: 67 Credit: 31,295 RAC: 0 |
Sees that Rosie staff do not look at this forum very often so has to be patient! Rhiju Apr 2. 8. and Mod Sense Apr 12. 18. Expect everyone is v busy but would appreciate an answer. |
genes Send message Joined: 8 Oct 05 Posts: 60 Credit: 704,566 RAC: 18 |
|
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Sees that Rosie staff do not look at this forum very often so has to be patient! I only see one such WU. I've not seen such an issue before, so I had no advice to offer. Rhiju, would this Workunit error - check skipped state be a problem on the validator? There don't appear to be any indications of a problem on the client side. [edit] Here's a thread that discusses the check skipped error. But they didn't really seem to reach a concrete cause/resolution there. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
why does the WU in progress return to 1% or less after ROH manager stops the computation to do cpu benchmqrking? The time remains the same but the % drops way back. I was at 72% before the cpu benchmarking began but then it drops back to 1% and climbs slowly back up. funny thing is that the time remains the same..now 6hrs plus out of 8hours run time and it is on model 14 step 63000+ and counting. this does not correspond to the percentage rate. Does 5.62 resolve this issue? |
Mod.Sense Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Aug 06 Posts: 4018 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Does 5.62 resolve this issue? Yes. And suggest you set your General Preferences to leave applications in memory while suspended. Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Does 5.62 resolve this issue? changed general prefs, did update and tried a shut down and resume, percentage went to 82% and then went back to low 0% with time done so far resuming where it left off. model 18 now and 12000 steps and counting. so nothing really changed despite the different settings in prefs. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems with Rosetta version 5.59
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org