Rosetta 4.1+ and 4.2+

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta 4.1+ and 4.2+

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 . . . 34 · Next

AuthorMessage
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 11,739,033
RAC: 7,061
Message 98436 - Posted: 7 Aug 2020, 17:33:54 UTC - in response to Message 98435.  

Looks like another bunch of dodgy Work Units.

Yes, I have a bunch of them - almost 10%. But they have started to abort the latest ones, so I think they have caught the problem.


I assume they can easily see when tasks are returned as failures. No need for us to concern ourselves with it.
ID: 98436 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98438 - Posted: 8 Aug 2020, 6:57:14 UTC - in response to Message 98433.  

Name: foldit0_2001734_0009_relax_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005379_3
Application: Rosetta v4.20 windows_x86_64
Device: 1759960
Task: 1234502102. WU: 1107127887
Status: Error while computing.
Exit status: -1 (0xFFFFFFFF) Unknown error code
Errors: Too many errors (may have bug) Too many total results.
Stderr output: (unknown error) - exit code -1 (0xffffffff)
command: projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_windows_x86_64.exe @foldit0_2001734_0009_local_dock_flags -in:file:boinc_wu_zip asym_dock_foldit0_2001734_0009_data.zip -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 2032508

[ ERROR ]: Caught exception:

File: ......srcutilityoptionsOptionCollection.cc:1398
Option matching -boinc:score_cut_smart_throttle not found in command line top-level context

AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS.
Appears quite similar to Grant's reported error. Wingman also failed, but different error code (Signal 11). Note my system Windows and that system Apple.
ID: 98438 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98439 - Posted: 8 Aug 2020, 7:35:13 UTC
Last modified: 8 Aug 2020, 7:54:51 UTC

First Android task I've processed in ages (also first Android error in ages).
Also had a similar Validate Error for another Android "foldit" task.

Name: foldit1_2001331_0001_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005715_293_0
Application: Rosetta v4.20 arm-android-linux-gnu
Device: 3396190
Task: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=1235917770]1235917770[/url]. WU: 1108336404
Status: Validate error
Exit status: 0 (0x00000000)
Stderr output:
WARNING: linker: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu: unused DT entry: type 0x6ffffffe arg 0x28ac
WARNING: linker: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu: unused DT entry: type 0x6fffffff arg 0x2
command: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu @foldit1_2001331_0001_global_dock_flags -in:file:boinc_wu_zip asym_dock_foldit1_2001331_0001_data.zip -patchdock foldit1_2001331_0001_patchdock.patchdock -patchdock_random_entry 1 3912 -in:file:s foldit1_2001331_0001_patchdock.pdb -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1396632
Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methyl/minirosetta_database

[ ERROR ]: Caught exception: File: src/protocols/rosetta_scripts/RosettaScriptsParser.cc:1313
Input Rosetta scripts XML file "asym_dock_global.xml" failed to validate against the Rosetta scripts schema. Use the option -parser::output_schema <output filename> to output the schema to a file to see all valid options.
Your XML has failed validation. The error message below will tell you where in your XML file the error occurred. Here's how to fix it:

1) If the validation fails on something obvious, like an illegal attribute due to a spelling error (perhaps you used scorefnction instead of scorefunction), then you need to fix your XML file.
2) If you haven&#226;&#128;&#153;t run the XML rewriter script and this might be pre-2017 Rosetta XML, run the rewriter script (tools/xsd_xrw/rewrite_rosetta_script.py) on your input XML first. The attribute values not being in quotes (scorefunction=talaris2014 instead of scorefunction="talaris2014") is a good indicator that this is your problem.
3) If you are a developer and neither 1 nor 2 worked - email the developer&#226;&#128;&#153;s mailing list or try Slack.
4) If you are an academic or commercial user - try the Rosetta Forums https://www.rosettacommons.org/forum

Error messages were:
Error: AttValue: " or ' expected
Number of <dock_design> errors skipped
------------------------------------------------------------
Warning messages were:
------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace -------------------------
BACKTRACE:
------------------------- End developer's backtrace --------------------------
DummyMover::apply() should never have been called! (JobDistributor/Parser should have replaced DummyMover.)

ERROR: Function not implemented.
ERROR:: Exit from: src/apps/public/boinc/minirosetta.cc line: 101
called boinc_finish(0)
ID: 98439 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1677
Credit: 17,767,500
RAC: 22,869
Message 98441 - Posted: 8 Aug 2020, 21:55:17 UTC

More foldit1 Validate errors after 30sec or less Runtime.

foldit1_2000906_0004_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005859_264_1
foldit1_2001860_0000_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005893_296_0

foldit1_2008835_0000_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005800_335_0

<core_client_version>7.6.22</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
command: projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_windows_x86_64.exe @foldit1_2008835_0000_global_dock_flags -in:file:boinc_wu_zip asym_dock_foldit1_2008835_0000_data.zip -patchdock foldit1_2008835_0000_patchdock.patchdock -patchdock_random_entry 1 5003 -in:file:s foldit1_2008835_0000_patchdock.pdb -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 1196927
Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methylminirosetta_database

[ ERROR ]: Caught exception:


File: ......srcprotocolsrosetta_scriptsRosettaScriptsParser.cc:1313
Input rosetta scripts XML file "asym_dock_global.xml" failed to validate against the rosetta scripts schema. Use the option -parser::output_schema <output filename> to output the schema to a file to see all valid options.
Your XML has failed validation.  The error message below will tell you where in your XML file the error occurred.  Here's how to fix it:

1) If the validation fails on something obvious, like an illegal attribute due to a spelling error (perhaps you used scorefnction instead of scorefunction), then you need to fix your XML file.
2) If you haven&#226;&#128;&#153;t run the XML rewriter script and this might be pre-2017 Rosetta XML, run the rewriter script (tools/xsd_xrw/rewrite_rosetta_script.py) on your input XML first.  The attribute values not being in quotes (scorefunction=talaris2014 instead of scorefunction="talaris2014") is a good indicator that this is your problem.
3) If you are a developer and neither 1 nor 2 worked - email the developer&#226;&#128;&#153;s mailing list or try Slack.
4) If you are an academic or commercial user - try the Rosetta Forums https://www.rosettacommons.org/forum


Error messages were:
Error: AttValue: " or ' expected

1:  <dock_design>
2: 	<SCOREFXNS>
3: 	   <fullatom weights=talaris2013 symmetric=0>
4: 	   </fullatom>
5: 	</SCOREFXNS>
6: 
7: 	<FILTERS>
8: 		<Ddg name=Isc scorefxn=fullatom threshold=0 jump=1 repeats=1 repack=0 confidence=1/>
Error: attributes construct error

1:  <dock_design>
2: 	<SCOREFXNS>
3: 	   <fullatom weights=talaris2013 symmetric=0>
4: 	   </fullatom>
5: 	</SCOREFXNS>
6: 
7: 	<FILTERS>
8: 		<Ddg name=Isc scorefxn=fullatom threshold=0 jump=1 repeats=1 repack=0 confidence=1/>
Error: Couldn't find end of Start Tag fullatom line 3

1:  <dock_design>
2: 	<SCOREFXNS>
3: 	   <fullatom weights=talaris2013 symmetric=0>
4: 	   </fullatom>
5: 	</SCOREFXNS>
6: 
7: 	<FILTERS>
8: 		<Ddg name=Isc scorefxn=fullatom threshold=0 jump=1 repeats=1 repack=0 confidence=1/>
Error: Opening and ending tag mismatch: SCOREFXNS line 2 and fullatom

1:  <dock_design>
2: 	<SCOREFXNS>
3: 	   <fullatom weights=talaris2013 symmetric=0>
4: 	   </fullatom>
5: 	</SCOREFXNS>
6: 
7: 	<FILTERS>
8: 		<Ddg name=Isc scorefxn=fullatom threshold=0 jump=1 repeats=1 repack=0 confidence=1/>
9: 		<Sasa name=sasa confidence=0/>
Error: Opening and ending tag mismatch: dock_design line 1 and SCOREFXNS

 1:  <dock_design>
 2: 	<SCOREFXNS>
 3: 	   <fullatom weights=talaris2013 symmetric=0>
 4: 	   </fullatom>
 5: 	</SCOREFXNS>
 6: 
 7: 	<FILTERS>
 8: 		<Ddg name=Isc scorefxn=fullatom threshold=0 jump=1 repeats=1 repack=0 confidence=1/>
 9: 		<Sasa name=sasa confidence=0/>
10: 		<ShapeComplementarity name=shape verbose=1  confidence=0 jump=1/>
Error: Extra content at the end of the document

 2: 	<SCOREFXNS>
 3: 	   <fullatom weights=talaris2013 symmetric=0>
 4: 	   </fullatom>
 5: 	</SCOREFXNS>
 6: 
 7: 	<FILTERS>
 8: 		<Ddg name=Isc scorefxn=fullatom threshold=0 jump=1 repeats=1 repack=0 confidence=1/>
 9: 		<Sasa name=sasa confidence=0/>
10: 		<ShapeComplementarity name=shape verbose=1  confidence=0 jump=1/>
11: 	</FILTERS>
12: 
------------------------------------------------------------
Warning messages were:
------------------------------------------------------------

 ------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace ------------------------- 
BACKTRACE:
 ------------------------- End developer's backtrace -------------------------- 


AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS.


DummyMover::apply() should never have been called! (JobDistributor/Parser should have replaced DummyMover.)

ERROR: Function not implemented.
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srcappspublicboincminirosetta.cc line: 101
23:43:47 (1468): called boinc_finish(0)

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 98441 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1994
Credit: 9,563,789
RAC: 6,764
Message 98452 - Posted: 9 Aug 2020, 18:55:49 UTC - in response to Message 98441.  

Some errors like this:
<message>
Function not correct.
(0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_windows_x86_64.exe @rb_08_08_34906_34106_ab_t000__robetta_FLAGS -in::file::fasta t000_.fasta -jumps:pairing_file t000_.fasta.bbcontacts.jumps -jumps:random_sheets 2 1 -constraints::cst_file t000_.fasta.CB.cst -constraints:cst_weight 5.0 -constraints::cst_fa_file t000_.fasta.MIN.cst -constraints:cst_fa_weight 5.0 -in:file:boinc_wu_zip rb_08_08_34906_34106_ab_t000__robetta.zip -frag3 rb_08_08_34906_34106_ab_t000__robetta.200.3mers.index.gz -fragA rb_08_08_34906_34106_ab_t000__robetta.200.5mers.index.gz -fragB rb_08_08_34906_34106_ab_t000__robetta.200.5mers.index.gz -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -mute all -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 3821484
Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methylminirosetta_database

[ ERROR ]: Caught exception:


File: C:cygwin64homeboinc4.17Rosettamainsourcesrccore/pack/dunbrack/SingleResidueDunbrackLibrary.hh:306
chi angle must be between -180 and 180: -nan(ind)
------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace -------------------------
BACKTRACE:
------------------------- End developer's backtrace --------------------------


AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS.

ID: 98452 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98480 - Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 7:34:41 UTC

Another set of Foldit1 invalidation errors on my Android tablet (an Amazon Fire tablet):
Name: foldit1_2008663_y688_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005783_946_0
Application: Rosetta v4.20 arm-android-linux-gnu
Device: 3396190
Task: 1238189780. WU: 1110337695
Status: Validate error
Exit status: 0 (0x00000000)
Stderr output:
WARNING: linker: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu: unused DT entry: type 0x6ffffffe arg 0x28ac
WARNING: linker: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu: unused DT entry: type 0x6fffffff arg 0x2

[ ERROR ]: Caught exception:

File: src/protocols/rosetta_scripts/RosettaScriptsParser.cc:1313
Input Rosetta scripts XML file "asym_dock_global.xml" failed to validate against the Rosetta scripts schema. Use the option -parser::output_schema <output filename> to output the schema to a file to see all valid options.
Your XML has failed validation. The error message below will tell you where in your XML file the error occurred. Here's how to fix it:

1) If the validation fails on something obvious, like an illegal attribute due to a spelling error (perhaps you used scorefnction instead of scorefunction), then you need to fix your XML file.
2) If you haven&#226;&#128;&#153;t run the XML rewriter script and this might be pre-2017 Rosetta XML, run the rewriter script (tools/xsd_xrw/rewrite_rosetta_script.py) on your input XML first. The attribute values not being in quotes (scorefunction=talaris2014 instead of scorefunction="talaris2014") is a good indicator that this is your problem.
3) If you are a developer and neither 1 nor 2 worked - email the developer&#226;&#128;&#153;s mailing list or try Slack.
4) If you are an academic or commercial user - try the Rosetta Forums https://www.rosettacommons.org/forum

Error messages were:
Error: AttValue: " or ' expected
<dock_design> errors included:
1. Error: attributes construct error
2. Error: Couldn't find end of Start Tag fullatom line 3
3. Error: Opening and ending tag mismatch: SCOREFXNS line 2 and fullatom
4. Error: Opening and ending tag mismatch: dock_design line 1 and SCOREFXNS
5. Error: Extra content at the end of the document
------------------------------------------------------------
Warning messages were:
------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------ Begin developer's backtrace -------------------------
BACKTRACE:
------------------------- End developer's backtrace --------------------------
DummyMover::apply() should never have been called! (JobDistributor/Parser should have replaced DummyMover.)

ERROR: Function not implemented.
ERROR:: Exit from: src/apps/public/boinc/minirosetta.cc line: 101
ID: 98480 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98482 - Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 8:24:34 UTC - in response to Message 98480.  

Other tasks which failed to validate for my Amazon tablet (3396190) included:
    1. Name: foldit1_2008663_y688_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005783_946
    Task: 1238189780

    2. Name: foldit1_2001331_0004_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005656_946
    Task: 1238189817

    3. Name: foldit1_2001734_0007_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005855_931
    Task: 1238132060

    4. Name: foldit1_2001331_0005_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005726_931
    Task: 1238131939

    5. Name: foldit1_2008899_c029_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005801_931
    Task: 1238130586

    6. Name: foldit1_2004919_s004_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005802_931
    Task: 1238130600


All of the above tasks had the same basic validation errors as posted in my previous message.

ID: 98482 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1677
Credit: 17,767,500
RAC: 22,869
Message 98486 - Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 18:32:14 UTC - in response to Message 98482.  
Last modified: 11 Aug 2020, 18:36:45 UTC

Other tasks which failed to validate for my Amazon tablet (3396190) included:
    1. Name: foldit1_2008663_y688_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005783_946
    Task: 1238189780

    2. Name: foldit1_2001331_0004_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005656_946
    Task: 1238189817

    3. Name: foldit1_2001734_0007_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005855_931
    Task: 1238132060

    4. Name: foldit1_2001331_0005_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005726_931
    Task: 1238131939

    5. Name: foldit1_2008899_c029_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005801_931
    Task: 1238130586

    6. Name: foldit1_2004919_s004_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005802_931
    Task: 1238130600


All of the above tasks had the same basic validation errors as posted in my previous message.

Yeah, seems to be an increasing number of errors with the foldit Work Units.

Edit- foldit1 seem to be the problem Work Units, foldit0 Tasks are processing with out problems.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 98486 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98488 - Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 5:36:14 UTC

More tasks which failed to validate for my Amazon tablet (3396190), as noted in message 98480, include:
    1. Name: foldit1_2008835_0007_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005865_1042_0
    Task: 1238599419
    2. Name: foldit1_2008899_0006_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005735_1039
    Task: 1238585227
    3. Name: foldit1_2008762_s009_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005863_1039
    Task: 1238585235
    4. Name: foldit1_2001822_0008_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005689_1031
    Task: 1238545676
    5. Name: foldit1_2001209_0006_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005688_1031
    Task: 1238545660
    6. Name: foldit1_2008663_y239_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005837_947
    Task: 1238195355
    7. Name: foldit1_2008663_s004_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005838_947
    Task: 1238195616
    8. Name: foldit1_2008663_y688_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005783_946
    Task: 1238189780

Plus 5 more tasks.

ID: 98488 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1994
Credit: 9,563,789
RAC: 6,764
Message 98489 - Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 6:09:24 UTC

All "simsjn_out_Protein_A" wus failed after few seconds, like this
1238899458

<stderr_txt>

ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file 00001.200.9mers
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorefragmentFragmentIO.cc line: 233
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
07:56:59 (14552): called boinc_finish(1)

</stderr_txt>


Have you tested it on Ralph???
ID: 98489 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 11,739,033
RAC: 7,061
Message 98492 - Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 12:48:28 UTC - in response to Message 98489.  
Last modified: 12 Aug 2020, 12:48:52 UTC

All "simsjn_out_Protein_A" wus failed after few seconds, like this
1238899458

<stderr_txt>

ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file 00001.200.9mers
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorefragmentFragmentIO.cc line: 233
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
07:56:59 (14552): called boinc_finish(1)

</stderr_txt>


Have you tested it on Ralph???


They don't seem to make much use of Ralph. I signed up to it a few weeks ago with 6 computers (and put it on extremely high weighting so it always did it first), and all I've had is a few tasks on one machine. Maybe they didn't think this needed testing, or were in a hurry to get the work done?
ID: 98492 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1994
Credit: 9,563,789
RAC: 6,764
Message 98493 - Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 13:06:30 UTC - in response to Message 98492.  

They don't seem to make much use of Ralph. I signed up to it a few weeks ago with 6 computers (and put it on extremely high weighting so it always did it first), and all I've had is a few tasks on one machine. Maybe they didn't think this needed testing, or were in a hurry to get the work done?

It's not the first time of a batch completely wrong.
My Ralph account is 2008, so it's a lot of time, and yes, it's under-used.
And have no sense to be hurry and have a lot of errors...
ID: 98493 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 11,739,033
RAC: 7,061
Message 98494 - Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 15:03:46 UTC - in response to Message 98493.  
Last modified: 12 Aug 2020, 15:04:09 UTC

They don't seem to make much use of Ralph. I signed up to it a few weeks ago with 6 computers (and put it on extremely high weighting so it always did it first), and all I've had is a few tasks on one machine. Maybe they didn't think this needed testing, or were in a hurry to get the work done?

It's not the first time of a batch completely wrong.
My Ralph account is 2008, so it's a lot of time, and yes, it's under-used.
And have no sense to be hurry and have a lot of errors...


Most of the tasks work, I've got 66 cores running Rosetta most of the time now. 10 million tasks in the server queue.... I just wish they had graphics card work.
ID: 98494 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1677
Credit: 17,767,500
RAC: 22,869
Message 98496 - Posted: 12 Aug 2020, 19:52:51 UTC - in response to Message 98489.  

All "simsjn_out_Protein_A" wus failed after few seconds, like this
1238899458

[quote]<stderr_txt>

ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file 00001.200.9mers
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorefragmentFragmentIO.cc line: 233
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
07:56:59 (14552): called boinc_finish(1)

</stderr_txt>
Same here.
100% failure rate so far for simsjn Work Units.

<core_client_version>7.6.33</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Incorrect function.
 (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
command: projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_windows_x86_64.exe -beta -frag3 00001.200.3mers -frag9 00001.200.9mers -abinitio::increase_cycles 10 -mute all -abinitio::fastrelax -relax::default_repeats 5 -abinitio::rsd_wt_helix 0.5 -abinitio::rsd_wt_loop 0.5 -abinitio::use_filters false -ex1 -ex2aro -in:file:boinc_wu_zip simsjn_out_Protein_A_v5_contacts_43_0_L20L2L1L2L2L2L2L3L20_fragments_fold_data.zip -abinitio::rg_reweight 0.5 -out:file:silent default.out -silent_gz -mute all -in:file:native 00001.pdb -out:file:silent_struct_type binary -nstruct 10000 -cpu_run_time 28800 -boinc:max_nstruct 20000 -checkpoint_interval 120 -database minirosetta_database -in::file::zip minirosetta_database.zip -boinc::watchdog -boinc::cpu_run_timeout 36000 -run::rng mt19937 -constant_seed -jran 2444184
Using database: database_357d5d93529_n_methylminirosetta_database

ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file 00001.200.9mers
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorefragmentFragmentIO.cc line: 233
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
15:16:31 (10040): called boinc_finish(1)

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 98496 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98498 - Posted: 13 Aug 2020, 5:11:13 UTC - in response to Message 98488.  
Last modified: 13 Aug 2020, 5:18:24 UTC

I continue to receive validation errors (36 total today!) on my Android devices for the foldit1 tasks, today adding my Samsung phone (3182472). The only difference in the error descriptions of the 2 devices so far is that the Amazon tablet (3396190) includes the added remarks:
WARNING: linker: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu: unused DT entry: type 0x6ffffffe arg 0x28ac
WARNING: linker: ../../projects/boinc.bakerlab.org_rosetta/rosetta_4.20_arm-android-linux-gnu: unused DT entry: type 0x6fffffff arg 0x2
not mentioned in the Samsung error. Of interest is the fact that Rosetta has not elected to rerun these particular validation errors with a wingperson. They have marked all these errors as "canonical." Also of interest is that all these errored tasks were created just this morning, despite the many reports of problems with this series of tasks!!! Doesn't appear anyone in "authority" bothers to read these posts, or just ignores them!!

Examples of the validation errors previously quoted by myself in this thread, as well as by Grant. Today's errors include the following tasks:
1. Name: foldit1_2008492_0006_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005840_1234
Task: 1239403625 on Amazon.
2. Name: foldit1_2001822_s003_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005892_1233
Task: 1239397848 on Samsung.
ID: 98498 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98499 - Posted: 13 Aug 2020, 8:08:12 UTC - in response to Message 98496.  

Name: simsjn_out_Protein_A_v5_contacts_36_7_L20L2L1L2L2L2L2L3L20_fragments_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1006608_826_0
Application: Rosetta v4.20 windows_x86_64
Device: 1759960
Task: 1238685086. WU: 1110767160
Status: Error while computing
Exit status: 1 (0x00000001) Unknown error code
Stderr output:
Incorrect function.
(0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
ERROR: ERROR: FragmentIO: could not open file 00001.200.9mers
ERROR:: Exit from: ......srccorefragmentFragmentIO.cc line: 233
BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out
00:45:27 (8780): called boinc_finish(1)
ID: 98499 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98505 - Posted: 14 Aug 2020, 5:32:56 UTC - in response to Message 98499.  

Re: WU 1110767160 -
simsjn_out_Protein_A_v5_contacts_36_7_L20L2L1L2L2L2L2L3L20_fragments_abinitio_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1006608_826_0

Just wanted to note that my wingman also got the same error as I, with notation "Too many errors (may have bug) Too many total results."
ID: 98505 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
James W

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 12
Posts: 130
Credit: 1,766,254
RAC: 0
Message 98513 - Posted: 15 Aug 2020, 7:59:50 UTC - in response to Message 98498.  

I continue to receive validation errors (8 total today) on my Android devices (3182472 and 3396190) for the foldit1 tasks. Again I question why these clearly erroneous tasks continue to be created! The batch in question today were created the morning of 8/14. What is to be gained by this waste of time, effort, and resources? The admins must know by now this particular set of tasks won't produce anything useful!

Examples of the specific validation errors have previously been quoted by myself and others in this thread. Today's errors include the following tasks:
1. Name: foldit1_2008707_s008_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005682_1795
Task: 1240650010
2. Name: foldit1_2008707_s007_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005684_1795
Task: 1240650112
3. Name: foldit1_2008663_y239_00_asym_dock_SAVE_ALL_OUT_1005837_1622
Task: 1240466476

Etc.
ID: 98513 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Grant (SSSF)

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 20
Posts: 1677
Credit: 17,767,500
RAC: 22,869
Message 98516 - Posted: 15 Aug 2020, 10:53:06 UTC - in response to Message 98513.  

The batch in question today were created the morning of 8/14. What is to be gained by this waste of time, effort, and resources? The admins must know by now this particular set of tasks won't produce anything useful!
More importantly, the researcher submitting the jobs should have noticed that by now themselves.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 98516 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Mr P Hucker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 06
Posts: 1600
Credit: 11,739,033
RAC: 7,061
Message 98522 - Posted: 15 Aug 2020, 18:29:36 UTC - in response to Message 98516.  

The batch in question today were created the morning of 8/14. What is to be gained by this waste of time, effort, and resources? The admins must know by now this particular set of tasks won't produce anything useful!
More importantly, the researcher submitting the jobs should have noticed that by now themselves.


Not sure why everyone is all upset about this. The proportion of tasks going wrong is very small, and those that do go wrong only take 20 seconds to do so, so they don't waste your time, and probably help the programmers find out why they went wrong.
ID: 98522 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 . . . 34 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Rosetta 4.1+ and 4.2+



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org