Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 327 · 328 · 329 · 330
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5746 Credit: 5,977,270 RAC: 2,121 ![]() |
How do you come up with these numbers? If your looking at Robetta page, did you exclude Domain Prediction jobs? As far as I know we only do Structure Prediction.This is Rosetta, and i use the numbers that are displayed on the main page under the Server Status section there for everyone to see. https://robetta.bakerlab.org/queue.php Where the proteins for us and for I guess the AI to study. I haven't taken the time to study it. Robetta is a protein structure prediction service that is continually evaluated through CAMEO Features include relatively fast and accurate deep learning based method, RoseTTAFold, and an interactive submission interface that allows custom sequence alignments for homology modeling, constraints, local fragments, and more. It can model multi-chain complexes using RoseTTAFold (user must provide paired MSA) or comparative modeling (CM) and provides the option for large scale sampling. The CM method uses the PDB100 template database, a co-evolution based model database (MDB), and also provides the option for custom templates. Computing resources are provided by the Baker lab and by volunteers from the distributed computing project Rosetta@home. You can help this service by joining Rosetta@home. For more information please visit our Frequently Asked Questions. PDB templates last updated June 14 2024 |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1813 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
While the Assimilator backlog has pretty much cleared, the Ready to Send buffer has fallen to 0 again. At least things worked for a few hours. Grant Darwin NT |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2303 Credit: 43,275,581 RAC: 27,115 ![]() |
I've only just added bwsrv1 to that personalDNSfilter app I was told about wrt the alternate boinc-files server Oh! I didn't realise that. That explains a few more things - thanks for pointing it out ![]() ![]() |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2303 Credit: 43,275,581 RAC: 27,115 ![]() |
While the Assimilator backlog has pretty much cleared, the Ready to Send buffer has fallen to 0 again. I was about to write the same - that In Progress is in the mid 190ks and Unsent was zero - just double-checked and Unsent is reported at 2200, so up from zero again. With the current active userbase, when everyone's filled up, the In Progress was around 225k so we're doing pretty well with a little way still to go. Not quite back to 'normal' but still slowly trying to get there after a good few days. Let's hope it keeps going for a little while longer ![]() ![]() |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2303 Credit: 43,275,581 RAC: 27,115 ![]() |
So from my view they got the bug fixed whatever it was.Or something else has happened, and it's helped whatever was going on. I'm inclined toward 'something else' too. I'm not relying on it. I haven't seen the assimilator issue for a while tbh. On Ready to Send, the target for Betas has always been 5k. I haven't seen too many Rosetta 4.20 tasks for a long while but for some reason I seem to think the figure they target is 25k of that type. No idea why they're different numbers, but that's why the overall quantity can get quite high iirc. I don't think the size of the queued tasks is the issue. When we had all those VirtualBox tasks the queue was over 20million for months without seeing the problems we have recently. ![]() ![]() |
Sid Celery Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 2303 Credit: 43,275,581 RAC: 27,115 ![]() |
I'm inclined toward 'something else' too. I'm not relying on it. I'm now going to correct (disagree with) myself The hardest question is usually "tell me what you can't see" What I can't/didn't see is the validators going down at all this week - so no-one had to wait for them to come back either So I'm now wondering if something actually <was> fixed, which explains why we're getting a regular supply of tasks from that large queue Does anyone want to double-check on all the other issues we've been struggling with recently? Might they be fixed too? That would explain one other thing I noticed this week ![]() ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1813 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
Does anyone want to double-check on all the other issues we've been struggling with recently?No need, it's still broken. Ready to send has been around zero for a few hours now, and the Tasks in Progress is taking a dive again. Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5746 Credit: 5,977,270 RAC: 2,121 ![]() |
Does anyone want to double-check on all the other issues we've been struggling with recently?No need, it's still broken. Because there are so many systems here we burn through the tasks faster than they can transfer them or however they do it. With 27,400+ "computers" online with chips like mine 16 "core" we can chew up the tasks faster than they can process them. Since your last post with the total queued tasks and as of this post we have processed 81,809 tasks in 12 hours or so. That's about 6800 tasks an hour Thats huge. I don't know where they get their queued number from or how they move tasks from the queue to the server, but I bet its human. And now its the weekend and if its not automatic, then you have to wait until monday morning or afternoon (US time) or for us here in Europe, afternoon to evening. And the way things are not refilled automatically, it looks like human. If you want this project to keep your system busy all the time then you have to hog a bunch of work. |
![]() Send message Joined: 28 Mar 20 Posts: 1813 Credit: 18,534,891 RAC: 2 |
Because there are so many systems here we burn through the tasks faster than they can transfer them or however they do it.Actually it's bugger all. Seti with much older and slower server hardware was handling 200k+ per hour. Here it's less than 195,000 per day. At it's peak it was around 300,00 per day. I don't know where they get their queued number from or how they move tasks from the queue to the server, but I bet its human.You just lost your bet. The Tasks supplied to the Queued Tasks are automated, however the part that supplies them is human- the Researchers. But moving them from the Queued Tasks to the Ready to send is fully automated. So the lack of work at present is purely due to project server issues. The work is there, the system just isn't moving it along to where it can be allocated & downloaded. Grant Darwin NT |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org