Message boards : Number crunching : Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
Previous · 1 . . . 244 · 245 · 246 · 247 · 248 · 249 · 250 . . . 300 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
Some BOINC projects are now using a very high initial estimate for the run time, possibly in order to get an especially high priority for their tasks. GPUGRID is one of them. You need to watch how the estimated time to completion drops in order to see if that happened,No, it's just Boinc, it doesn't have a clue how to add up, it's always doing stupid stuff. Like leaving everything to the very last minute and returning tasks late. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
Some BOINC projects are now using a very high initial estimate for the run time, possibly in order to get an especially high priority for their tasks. GPUGRID is one of them. You need to watch how the estimated time to completion drops in order to see if that happened,If that was true, it would only work once. Boinc then adjusts using the duration correction factor. So, no point in a project doing so. |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 2,588 |
Some BOINC projects are now using a very high initial estimate for the run time, possibly in order to get an especially high priority for their tasks. GPUGRID is one of them. You need to watch how the estimated time to completion drops in order to see if that happened,If that was true, it would only work once. Boinc then adjusts using the duration correction factor. So, no point in a project doing so. What I'm seeing with GPUGRID work does not agree with you. The tasks start out with an expected runtime of hundreds of days (well past the deadline) and actually finish in less than two days, over and over. One possibility I've thought of - the duration correction factor works for CPU tasks, but does not work for GPU tasks. I've only seen this odd behavior on GPU tasks, GPUGRID seldom offers any CPU tasks. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Some BOINC projects are now using a very high initial estimate for the run time, possibly in order to get an especially high priority for their tasks. GPUGRID is one of them. You need to watch how the estimated time to completion drops in order to see if that happened,If that was true, it would only work once. Boinc then adjusts using the duration correction factor. So, no point in a project doing so. I run GPU grid as well. I think what screws up BOINC time remaining is that although it is a GPU task it is running a ton of CPU processes and this backwards running is what BOINC does not understand. I am 80.80% done with the current task in 2 days and 8 hours and 42 minutes, remaining time to completion is 11 days 11 hours and 16 minutes. Somehow that does make sense. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Cosmology, I used their fine print to get to the University's Astronomy Department and emailed them asking if they could find the right person for the BOINC side. No response so far. Doubt there ever will be. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
For those of you interested in other BOINC projects: So whats left out there for science? Denis is down with a unexpected model issue or something along those lines. WCG is barely getting by and not all projects are online and seem to kick up transient http errors by the dozens. SiDock is the only really new project kicking butt. I run a few other projects as well along with GPU Grid. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
What I'm seeing with GPUGRID work does not agree with you. The tasks start out with an expected runtime of hundreds of days (well past the deadline) and actually finish in less than two days, over and over.Complain to GPU Grid and suggest you might leave if they mess around. Stealing CPU time from other projects is theft. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
Cosmology, I used their fine print to get to the University's Astronomy Department and emailed them asking if they could find the right person for the BOINC side.Well I assume there's an Astronomy department still alive and kicking, and they'll pass it on or tell you something's not in use any more. It seems odd to me though they'd leave a server switched on with nobody doing anything. However there must be, because twice recently I've seen it grind to a halt due to lack of disk space, then suddenly there was disk space, that can only mean human intervention. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
So whats left out there for science? Denis is down with a unexpected model issue or something along those lines. WCG is barely getting by and not all projects are online and seem to kick up transient http errors by the dozens. SiDock is the only really new project kicking butt.I run these: Climate prediction: rare CPU tasks at the moment, but lots more coming with a new program they're writing to use multiple cores to allow more accurate research, and virtualbox so the linux stuff can be run on windows. Cosmology Denis Einstein - new radio waves research by a PhD student LHC - constant supply of single core and multicore VB work. Milkyway QuChemPedia - interesting chemistry research Rosetta Sidock TN-Grid - genetics Universe WCG - loads of work now, and I've never had a single error you speak of |
robertmiles Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 1232 Credit: 14,269,631 RAC: 2,588 |
What I'm seeing with GPUGRID work does not agree with you. The tasks start out with an expected runtime of hundreds of days (well past the deadline) and actually finish in less than two days, over and over.Complain to GPU Grid and suggest you might leave if they mess around. Stealing CPU time from other projects is theft. They aren't using much CPU time - only GPU time. They aren't increasing the GPU time they get - only getting it sooner then otherwise. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
They aren't using much CPU time - only GPU time.Which is worse, and clearly what I meant. They aren't increasing the GPU time they get - only getting it sooner then otherwise.And disturbing your queue of work so things could get returned late. Climate prediction do the opposite and refuse to change, they shoot themselves in the foot. They want the tasks back in 1 month, but they set the deadline at 1 year. So Boinc doesn't do them as urgently as it should and they get the tasks back late. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Cosmology Denis - he's not creating any work right now and has gone silent. Tasks ready to send 0 Tasks in progress 0 Einstein - new radio waves research by a PhD student - already got that one LHC - constant supply of single core and multicore VB work. - Running ATLAS Milkyway - Got thhis QuChemPedia - interesting chemistry research - Can't run this, does not work on my system. Might try again. Rosetta - duh Sidock - got this TN-Grid - genetics _ interesting, will have a look ***Is this CPU or GPU or both?*** Universe - used to run that. WCG - loads of work now, and I've never had a single error you speak of Only getting OPN because I am trying to fill my GPU queue. CPU has enough 10/18/2022 8:50:47 AM | World Community Grid | Temporarily failed download of ab73b5548cff860eccd4f3bd6afcc1b4.pdbqt: transient HTTP error 10/18/2022 8:50:47 AM | World Community Grid | Backing off 00:10:09 on download of ab73b5548cff860eccd4f3bd6afcc1b4.pdbqt (and repeat 15 times) - aborted. They didn't do a blinking thing over night which is normal when they are stalled out with transient. I think I abort more stalled downloads than I do work. Seems to be a GPU task thing. CPU works just fine. Almost thing its time to stuff WCG for a month and come back. Another group that is in over their heads and can't fix stuff. |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
QuChemPedia - interesting chemistry research - Can't run this, does not work on my system. Might try again.I don't remember having problems, but they're out of work just now so I can't test, and I haven't run it for so long my tasks aren't in Boinctasks history or server history. TN-Grid - genetics _ interesting, will have a look ***Is this CPU or GPU or both?***CPU only. WCG - loads of work now, and I've never had a single error you speak ofSo your only problem is you have to retry downloads? You need to run "boinccmd --network_available" from a batch file and/or task scheduler. This will retry all downloads. You can set it to run as often as you like. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
QuChemPedia - interesting chemistry research - Can't run this, does not work on my system. Might try again.I don't remember having problems, but they're out of work just now so I can't test, and I haven't run it for so long my tasks aren't in Boinctasks history or server history. I tried looking that up..I don't really understand or know what to do to make downloads retry every 5 mins or something |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
TN is only using 29.51%. GPU grid is done processing. Now just a lucky WCG and a PrimeGrid are running. So whats up with that? Oh and since I was having trouble with WCG GPU, I opened it up to CPU, but still only get GPU if they succeed in downloading. |
kotenok2000 Send message Joined: 22 Feb 11 Posts: 258 Credit: 483,503 RAC: 133 |
cd /d e:\Program Files\BOINC :loop boinccmd --network_available TIMEOUT /T 300 /nobreak goto loop |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
Which I placed in a batch file and told Windows to run at startup and minimised.cd /d e:\Program Files\BOINC :loop boinccmd --network_available TIMEOUT /T 300 /nobreak goto loop |
Mr P Hucker Send message Joined: 12 Aug 06 Posts: 1600 Credit: 11,716,822 RAC: 13,035 |
TN is only using 29.51%.Do you mean a TNGrid task only uses 29.51% of a CPU core? Oh and since I was having trouble with WCG GPU, I opened it up to CPU, but still only get GPU if they succeed in downloading.Their settings on the server are probably still fucked, they were last time I tried to change them, so you can't make a computer get different sorts of tasks than you usually do. |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
Which I placed in a batch file and told Windows to run at startup and minimised.cd /d e:\Program Files\BOINC :loop boinccmd --network_available TIMEOUT /T 300 /nobreak goto loop what do you call this file? |
Greg_BE Send message Joined: 30 May 06 Posts: 5691 Credit: 5,859,226 RAC: 0 |
So WCG is screwed up, Cosmology as well. What's going on? I went back to MOO. I used to do them long ago, but looks like my account was deleted at some point in time. |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems and Technical Issues with Rosetta@home
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org